Steve Jobs compared to Peter Drucker

Steve Jobs built Apple Computer into one of the most successful and valuable companies in history. He had a distinctive management style.

How would his management compare to the advice Peter Drucker would give a CEO?

Steve Jobs’ practice of management:

Heavy stress on innovation. He did not have all the innovative thoughts that proved successful but he quickly recognized a potentially successful idea or product. Since he was not risk averse, he forcefully pushed for its development.

Focused on and generated well above average profits.

Strictly limited priorities to three.

Had excellent judgment on who were the A level employees. Successfully hired and retained them. Categorized employees performing below the A level as “Bozos” – a Bozos’ employment was terminated or he made the person’s life so difficult that they left the company.

Submerged himself in all levels of the company via random walk and meetings. Aggressively practiced hand-on management of even the most minor factors. Was incredibly exacting.

Practiced full and open cross-functional communication. Hated PowerPoint presentations and written documents – preferred face-to-face, verbal discussions. His meetings included all organization levels –whoever was knowledgeable was included.

Treated all people harshly. He was difficult to work with – emotional, explosive. Angry. Accusatory. Brutally candid. Demanding in the extreme. But he created an exciting and successful culture that motivated and retained the A level employees.

Mr. Drucker’s tenets that were the same as Steve Jobs’:

Innovation was one of Mr. Drucker’s key factors for success. He advised that successful organizations abandon outdated strategies, products, and processes and have a bias for innovation. Absent innovation organizations become complacent, insular and corrupt.

“Above all management is responsible for producing results. Profit is a requirement for a company…profitability is not the purpose but rather the test of their validity.” “The ultimate test of a manager, and the only one that counts, is …accomplishment…it isn’t only accomplishing things…it’s accomplishing the right things (i.e., generating profit).”

 He was concerned with retaining and motivating “knowledge workers” – his words for A level employees.

He advocated for “ruthlessly” terminating employees who failed to perform at the A level.

Elimination of excessive bureaucracy and management layers. Apple had a layered organization but Mr. Jobs’ management practice created a somewhat unique organization with integrated, seemingly un-layered functions.

Communication. Communicate a clear strategy throughout the organization. Successful companies have a bias for frequent, repeated and in-depth communication.

Write down your priorities – no more than two. “Companies must avoid the temptation to dabble in many things.” Mr. Jobs had three.

Peter Drucker differed from Mr. Jobs with:

He “…argued for decentralization – the process of delegating decision making down into an organization, closer to the people who actually do the work…”. Mr. Jobs did not; he made the decisions, even minor ones.

To Mr. Drucker the customer was a factor critical to success. He coined the phrase: “Outside-in perspective”. Definition: customer focus, involvement, input – spend time with customers. Mr. Jobs did not want customer input, he did not seek it.

Mr. Drucker advocated for the dignity of the individual and for humanizing the workplace. “Management is about human beings. Create an atmosphere where people are permitted to make mistakes.” He would not have agreed with Mr. Jobs confrontational, bullying style.

Click on this link for an earlier posting on: Peter Drucker’s Tenets

Sources: The comparison is from Walter Isaacson’s biography of Apple Computer’s Chief Executive Officer titled ‘Steve Jobs’ and from two books on Peter Drucker’s tenets: “The Daily Drucker” and “Inside Drucker’s Brain”.

 

Leave A Comment

Categories

Services

Chief Executive Officer

Executive Chairman

Turnarounds & Operational Restructurings

Adviser to creditors, board of directors or owners

Pre-acquisition & troubled company due diligence evaluations

Develop strategic and operating plans - including Court required plans of reorganization

Acquisition advice and negotiations

Serve as Member Board of Directors

Testify in Federal and State Court

Reason I wrote my book “Learn to Whisper”

Click on this link for a more complete description of “Learn to Whisper”

The reason I wrote “Learn to Whisper”:

My conclusion after operating as a Turnaround Chief Executive Officer for more than twenty-five years is that the majority of this country’s top management is far from first-rate. In fact top management, particularly at the chief executive officer level, is at best average with a large number that can be rated mediocre. This lack of management competence has seen this country’s market leaders lose sizeable market share to foreign manufacturers able to export better quality and lower cost products to the USA. It has seen manufacturing and service operations unnecessarily moved to foreign countries. All of which has negatively affected the economy, severely damaged former blue-chip corporations and seen quality jobs lost.

It is quite common to discover that companies struggling with this inability to compete with foreign companies have been simply mismanaged. The once successful business deteriorated because of an incompetent chief executive officer and weak senior management

Why doesn’t this nation have first-rate management? Inadequate training. Chief executive officers and vice presidents learn “on the job”. A number get promoted based on personality, political connections and drive – not merit. They are not carefully screened for the potential to become successful at managing. For some all that is needed is a well-written resume, the right interviewing style and the inability of a new employer to accurately assess skills, performance and potential.

Compare this to the process doctors go through. From medical school to internship to residency to a senior role after years of education, experience and continuous training their progress and capabilities are constantly monitored even after they become senior in the profession. Generals and Admirals go through a similar protocol. They must prove themselves in low-level assignments before they are judged qualified for senior positions. Unqualified applicants in both professions are culled out. What can be done to improve management competence? Education, on-the-job training and job performance monitoring. My book will educate people on the subject of managing. Its 101 management lessons are separated into the 17 subjects managers need to know.