Where is China Heading?

Mark Leonard’s book “What Does China Think?” presents China’s challenges and struggles with some surprising priorities its leaders have set to correct them.

For the first time in China’s history its 11th five-year plan does not list economic growth as its first priority. The plan: “put people first”…“respecting the natural environment”…introduces a Scandinavian model of social welfare to eliminate its existing problems.

China’s most pressing problems:

1. The rise in protests,

2. The gap between rich and poor,

3. The near bankruptcy of the rural economy,

4. The lack of domestic consumption,

5.The pervasive corruption of the political elite,

6.The environment.

Official records cite 87,000 protest demonstrations in 2005, a ten-fold increase from 1993. The actual number is higher.

China wants to develop into an “Asymmetric Superpower” – which argues that the USA’s obsession with military hardware is its greatest weakness blinding policy-makers to the wider picture of military strategy which for China must include the use of economic, legal and political weapons as well, labeled: “non-military warfare”. “Economic Warfare”includes investing billions of dollars in “Special Economic Zones” in other countries.

However, China invests billions to improve its military, as its leaders believe economic power without military power equal to the USA’s reduces China as an overall power.

“China is attractive to other nations because of its economic power but this attractiveness will not last. It will need to change its political system to become a ‘Hyper-Power’ equal to the USA”. But China will need to eliminate its incongruous and obsessive policy toward four minor issues that it has elevated to threats to its survival: Taiwan, Dalai Lama, Falun Gong, Muslim Enclaves.

China “will never be supportive of multi-party elections and human rights.” It will not become a democracy, it will become a “deliberative dictatorship”. Today China is governed by “rule by man”. Will it become a “rule of law”? It believes that democracy will increase the number of protests and poses a threat to Communist Party control.

“It is possible that Beijing’s formula of state capitalism, open markets and a closed political system will not last the course. However, it is worth noting that it took three generations for a Soviet economic model that did not work in theory to actually fail in practice. Those who argued that the People’s Republic would become more Western with its growing wealth have been proven wrong.”

China’s greatest risk is that its government will lose the ability to hold things together. Its population is becoming increasingly assertive.

Will China unseat the USA as the world’s largest economy? Not in the twenty-first century.

In the 1980s, Japan was expected to dominate the world economy. But because its institutions and political system failed to modernize, Japan went in to a fifteen-year slump. Japan was a wealthy first-world country in the 1980s. China, while not a third-world country, is a poor country and will encounter many of the challenges that derailed Japan.

Mark Leonard is Executive Director, European Council on Foreign Relations. He spent three years studying China.

My personal experience in working in China leads me to predict that the pendulum will swing. China will stumble, similar to the historic decline of Japan, due to cost increases from unfavorable currency changes, productivity declines, wage increases, and social unrest. China’s low birth rate and aging population are two additional factors that will negatively affect its economic growth. Capital will be diverted from infrastructure and commercial investments, to solving intractable environmental conditions.

Poor planning for efficiency and productivity will prove problematic as well. A vivid example, is the current pattern of the rapidly constructed manufacturing buildings in China. These are still being built several stories high, with poorly designed freight elevators, which are far too small and slow. Surprisingly, many plant owners do not build the more proficient single story buildings. The principal reason for this lack of attention to effectual strategy, is largely due to the extremely low hourly wages. However, some in China are simply unaware of traditional low-cost manufacturing initiatives. Manufacturing knowledge remains rather poor, perhaps equal to the USA’s in the 1970s.

The eventual need to expand manufacturing arenas in China will prove difficult as well. The reluctance in moving business to the Western provinces has many factors. For instance, many plant owners will not want to locate operations further inland to the West. They seem to prefer the heavily populated, higher wage, land restricted East Coast, for all manufacturing facility locations. Simply because, so many reside in nearby Hong Kong – which is a short ferry ride from the Mainland. Most high-income owners still see Mainland China as an unattractive place for their personal residence.

Another major obstacle to maintaining growth, is the sincere lack of freight forwarding capability within the country. Although China has invested heavily in infrastructure, it does not have the trucking capability to deliver components in an economical manner. There are no real substantial Trucking Companies in China which are regularly employed in the United States, as of yet. They simply do not have the Trucking Industry potential, with common capacity sizes of a Class 6 to 8 available, (often referenced as an “18 Wheeler” in the USA). Most deliveries are made in “light to medium duty” sized vehicles– similar to a common ‘one room’ rental unit commonly found in the United States: closer to Classes 1 through 4 in GVWR. Also, using the Chinese Railroad for product shipment is a common problem, because of the exorbitant charges, uncertain train schedules, and costly damage rates.

Additional problems for the relocating of operations in the West, which will be essential for productive growth, is the difficulty in recruiting quality management to live far from the conveniences from the major Urban environments. Management can be persuaded to reside in a remote location, but this proves to be quite an expensive exchange. Furthermore, management has a tradition when working in the more remote areas of China to work four days per week. They will arrive Monday at 12:00 PM, and depart on Friday at 12:00 PM. The long-term commitment is often a serious concern. As wages rise throughout the Nation, to continue to maintain China’s economic engine running at this level, the need will rise to locate plants in remote areas, with more abundant and less expensive labor sources.

Leave A Comment

Categories

Services

Chief Executive Officer

Executive Chairman

Turnarounds & Operational Restructurings

Adviser to creditors, board of directors or owners

Pre-acquisition & troubled company due diligence evaluations

Develop strategic and operating plans - including Court required plans of reorganization

Acquisition advice and negotiations

Serve as Member Board of Directors

Testify in Federal and State Court

Reason I wrote my book “Learn to Whisper”

Click on this link for a more complete description of “Learn to Whisper”

The reason I wrote “Learn to Whisper”:

My conclusion after operating as a Turnaround Chief Executive Officer for more than twenty-five years is that the majority of this country’s top management is far from first-rate. In fact top management, particularly at the chief executive officer level, is at best average with a large number that can be rated mediocre. This lack of management competence has seen this country’s market leaders lose sizeable market share to foreign manufacturers able to export better quality and lower cost products to the USA. It has seen manufacturing and service operations unnecessarily moved to foreign countries. All of which has negatively affected the economy, severely damaged former blue-chip corporations and seen quality jobs lost.

It is quite common to discover that companies struggling with this inability to compete with foreign companies have been simply mismanaged. The once successful business deteriorated because of an incompetent chief executive officer and weak senior management

Why doesn’t this nation have first-rate management? Inadequate training. Chief executive officers and vice presidents learn “on the job”. A number get promoted based on personality, political connections and drive – not merit. They are not carefully screened for the potential to become successful at managing. For some all that is needed is a well-written resume, the right interviewing style and the inability of a new employer to accurately assess skills, performance and potential.

Compare this to the process doctors go through. From medical school to internship to residency to a senior role after years of education, experience and continuous training their progress and capabilities are constantly monitored even after they become senior in the profession. Generals and Admirals go through a similar protocol. They must prove themselves in low-level assignments before they are judged qualified for senior positions. Unqualified applicants in both professions are culled out. What can be done to improve management competence? Education, on-the-job training and job performance monitoring. My book will educate people on the subject of managing. Its 101 management lessons are separated into the 17 subjects managers need to know.