Case Study: Wells Aluminum Corp.
Wells Aluminum Corp., Indiana
Situation & Problems:
In March 1991, Wells Aluminum sold one of its customers, Kero Company, an unusually large volume of aluminum extrusions. Before Wells could obtain payment for the extrusions, Kero filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in May 1991.
Wells Aluminum was owned by Gibbons, Green, van Amerongen – the New York Leveraged Buy-Out Firm. Wells’ subordinated bonds were in work-out at Wells Fargo Bank. Wells Aluminum wanted to advise the bank of the alternatives available, other than a 100% write off of the Kero receivable without the prospect of any recovery.
Wells Aluminum became Robert Amter’s first client when retained to complete a due diligence review of Kero.
Kero’s product lines, sales and profit are as follows:
………….Actual…………
Product Line (000$) Sales Pretax Profit % of Sales
Above ground swimming pools $9,066 $ 645 7.1%
Office products: file cabinets,
security boxes, desks, chairs 6,231 (2,019) (32.4%)
Radiator enclosures 971 (55) (5.7%)
Total $16,268 $(1,429) (8.8%)
Conclusions:
» Sales could be increased in the swimming pool business. The product was competitively priced. Quality was equal to or better than competition. Sales were limited to the mid-west and mid-atlantic states, and distribution could be expanded to other geographic areas. The product line was not complete, and could be extended without a large capital investment.
» The money losing office products line should be shut down. The line was not competitive in price, quality or features. The capital investment needed to improve it would have a negative return.
» The radiator enclosure line’s sales could be increased. Quality and reputation were good. Price points were competitive. Distribution was limited to New York City Metropolitan area and could be expanded to additional cold weather geographic areas.
» Evaluation of the manufacturing operation indicated that cost of sales and inventories could be improved in the swimming pool and radiator enclosure product lines.
» The plant was owned by Kero. It was relatively new, in a good industrial park, and was salable.
Recommendations and Results:
Suggestions to the creditor committee:
~ Not accept a low settlement offer from the owners.
~ Break Kero’s exclusivity. Petition the Court for the right to present a reorganization plan. Kero agreed to it.
~ If an acceptable negotiated settlement could not be reached with the owners and the creditors gained control of Kero, the alternatives were as follows:
Sell Kero’s two profitable businesses and the plant “as is”.
Hire a general manager to improve Kero’s two profitable businesses. Shut down the money loser. After two years of improved results, sell the company and the plant.
At this time, the exclusive master distributor of Kero’s swimming pools offered to purchase the entire company for about 7 cents on each dollar owed to the trade creditors. The bank’s $3.3 million loan would be fully paid.
This was not acceptable. The creditors knew Kero had a higher value.
Rather than accept this offer, a general partner of Gibbons, Green, van Amerongen entered a bid to acquire Kero and also the swimming pool master distributor’s business.
» After meetings in and out of the bankruptcy court, the swimming pool master distributor raised its offer for Kero to 65 cents on the dollar. This offer was accepted by the creditors.
TweetWells Fargo Bank reacted favorably to the settlement.